• Advertisement

2.25" vs 2.5"

Getting the best performance from your Isuzu, the in's and out's

2.25" vs 2.5"

Postby ErikSA » Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:04 am

Hi, this is my first post to this forum.
I have a 1998 Isuzu Frontier 4x4 with the 4JB1-T engine and the following mods:
bullbar with led spots
2" lift kit
Rancho shocks with the Myride system
snorkel
Large front mount intercooler (from a Mitsubishi evo 6)
Boost @ 18Psi + fuel screw adjustment (as of today)
2.25' semi-freeflow exhaust (with ugly, restrictive looking bends).
I was wondering, would it be worth fitting a 2.5" freeflow pipe from the turbo all the way to the back, considering the mods I have done so far?
I am also planning to fit an egt gauge soon.
ErikSA
I'm only here for the information
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:35 pm
Age: 20
Country: South Africa
City: Pretoria
Vehicle: 1998 Isuzu Frontier 280

Re: 2.25" vs 2.5"

Postby geeves » Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:59 am

Original was 2 inch so your already 50% bigger. A 2.5 will work better but if the existing system is still good the gains might not justify the cost. If it needs work though then 2.5 is the way to go
Sanding your knuckles before starting work can help. That way you cant skin them
User avatar
geeves
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8964
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Rangiora
Age: 63
Country: NZ
City: Rangiora
Vehicle: 94 bighorn 4jg2
2013 Subaru XV

Re: 2.25" vs 2.5"

Postby ErikSA » Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:04 am

I think Im just going to do it, even if all it does is lower the EGTs a bit.
ErikSA
I'm only here for the information
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:35 pm
Age: 20
Country: South Africa
City: Pretoria
Vehicle: 1998 Isuzu Frontier 280


Return to Engines and Exhaust

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests